Introduction Business Education Government U.S. Visa Tourism

Home > Economic & Trade > U.S. Trade Law > Authorities Relating to Political and Economic Security

Authorities Relating to Political and Economic Security

AUTHORITIES RELATING TO POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SECURITY

International Emergency Economic Powers Act

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), passed in 1977, gives the president of the United States the power to freeze foreign assets in the United States, to impose trade embargoes, and to take other measures judged necessary to deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. national security, foreign policy, or economic interests.

Under the act the president, after consulting with Congress, can declare that a national emergency exists because of a threat from a source outside the United States. After the declaration of emergency, the president has the power to "investigate, regulate, compel, or prohibit" virtually any economic transaction by a foreign entity in the United States.

Once the national emergency has gone into effect, the president must submit to Congress a detailed report explaining and justifying his actions.

IEEPA can be used with other laws in the imposition of the emergency economic sanctions.

Some of the uses of the IEEPA include the following:
-- President Jimmy Carter, in November 1979, froze Iranian assets in the United States in response to the seizure of hostages at the U.S. embassy in Teheran.
-- President Ronald Reagan, in May 1985, imposed a trade embargo on Nicaragua, embargoed certain trade and financial transactions with the government of South Africa in October 1985, and embargoed trade, transportation links, extension of credit, and travel to Libya in January 1986.
-- President George Bush, in August 1990, blocked Iraqi and Kuwaiti assets and property and imposed a trade embargo on Iraq and, in September 1990, extended the export control system of the expired Export Administration Act of 1979.
-- President Bill Clinton, in August 1994, continued the extension of the export control system of the expired Export Administration Act of 1979 and, in March 1996, blocked dealings with the management or development of the Iranian petroleum industry.

Trading With the Enemy Act

The Trading With the Enemy Act (TWTEA), originally passed in 1917, prohibits trade by the United States with any enemy or ally of an enemy during time of war. In 1977, the presidential authority provided in TWTEA to control economic transactions during peacetime were transferred to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Since then, IEEPA has been the principal vehicle for imposing economic measures on foreign adversaries when there has not been an official declaration of war.

Narcotics Control Trade Act

This law, which is part of the Drug Enforcement, Education, and Control Act of 1986, establishes a process whereby the president can impose a level of trade sanctions deemed appropriate against "uncooperative" major drug-producing or drug-transit countries.

Under the law, if a country is found not to be cooperating fully with U.S. anti-drug efforts, the president can revoke all preferential duty treatments, such as GSP, CBI, and ATPA, impose duties of up to 50 percent of the value of products, suspend commercial air services, and take other measures.

International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1985

Section 505 of this law gives the president discretionary authority to restrict or ban imports from any country that the United States has determined supports terrorism or terrorist organizations or harbors terrorists or terrorist organizations. The president must consult with Congress in advance of invoking this authority and must make semi-annual reports to Congress.

Embargo on Transactions with Cuba

A trade embargo was imposed against Cuba in 1960 under the general authority of the Export Control Act of 1949. The embargo's continuation was contained in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and in subsequent legislation.

As the law regarding trade with Cuba now stands, no U.S. product or service may be exported to that country directly or through third countries except for publications and informational material and certain humanitarian goods licensed for export by the U.S. Department of Commerce, such as medicine and medical supplies. U.S. persons may not deal in or assist with the sale of goods or commodities to or from Cuba from offshore locations. Goods and services of Cuban origin may not be imported into the United States through third countries. No vessel carrying goods or passengers to or from Cuba or carrying goods in which Cuba or a Cuban national has any interest may enter a U.S. port. Vessels engaged in trade with Cuba are prohibited from loading or unloading freight at any place in the United States for 180 days after departing a Cuban port.

U.S. economic sanctions against Cuba were increased through passage of the 1996 Libertad Act, known as the "Helms-Burton Act" after its sponsors, Senator Jesse Helms and Congressman Dan Burton. This act does not contain new restrictions on trade; its principle thrust is against foreign firms that are investing in Cuba.

Iraq Sanctions Act of 1990

The Iraq Sanctions Act enacted into law the trade embargo and other economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by presidential order shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.

The act imposes sanctions that go beyond the presidential order. It contains provisions aimed at increasing compliance by third countries with United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iraq.

Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996

President Clinton signed the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act on August 5, 1996. The act tightens existing sanctions against the two countries. It provides for penalties against any U.S. individual or company, including a U.S. or foreign parent or subsidiary, that directly and significantly contributes to the development of the petroleum resources of either country. The law applies to any investment of $40 million or more, or any combination of investments of at least $10 million that add up to $40 million, made during any 12-month period. U.S. persons or companies also face sanctions for providing certain goods and services to Libya that significantly contribute to Libya's ability to acquire chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons or significant amounts and types of conventional weapons, or that contribute to Libya's ability maintain its aviation capabilities. The law also provides for other sanctions.

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

This law makes it a criminal offense for a U.S. citizen or resident to engage in certain financial transactions with the governments of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria, except as provided for in regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State. These countries are on the U.S. government list of governments found to be supporting international terrorism.

Other Unilateral Economic Sanctions

Laws that call on the president to impose unilateral economic sanctions against a certain country for non-economic reasons are frequently provisions of much larger pieces of legislation, such as the foreign aid bill.

Disapproving Foreign Investment in Defense-related Industries

Following the proposed purchase in 1988 of an 80 percent share of a major U.S. semiconductor manufacturer by Fujitsu Ltd. of Japan, Congress passed an amendment to the Defense Production Act allowing the president to block foreign takeovers of firms found to be important to U.S. national security.

This provision is known as Exon-Florio, after its two sponsors, Senator James Exon and Representative Jim Florio. Under the law, the president can act to suspend or prohibit any acquisition, merger, or takeover of a U.S. firm by foreign persons if the president determines that the foreign purchaser might take actions that would threaten national security.

In making the decision to exercise this authority, the president may consider factors such as the domestic production needed for projected national defense requirements, the capacity of domestic industries to meet national defense requirements, and how the control of domestic industries and commercial activities by foreign citizens would affect the capacity of the United States to meet national defense requirements.

 

AL | AK | AZ | AR | CA | CO | CT | DE | FL | GA | HI | ID | IL | IN | IA | KS | KY | LA | ME | MD | MA | MI | MN | MS | MO | MT

NE | NV | NH | NJ | NM | NY | NC | ND | OH | OK | OR | PA | RI | SC | SD | TN | TX | UT | VT | VA | WA | DC | WV | WI | WY

Link to Us | Contact Us | Home Copyright 2007 USAers. All Rights Reserved